When the Victor Cannot Claim the Spoils: Institutional Incentives for Professionalizing Patronage States

Accesible PDF image
Peer Reviewed icon Peer Reviewed
Date issued
Apr 2016
Subject
Patronage;
Professionalization;
Merit-Based Recruitment;
Public Employment;
Elections;
Legislature;
Constitution;
Public Service;
Governance
JEL code
D73 - Bureaucracy • Administrative Processes in Public Organizations • Corruption;
H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government;
M51 - Firm Employment Decisions • Promotions;
N46 - Latin America • Caribbean;
O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors • Shadow Economy • Institutional Arrangements
Country
Dominican Republic;
United States;
Paraguay
Category
Working Papers
Merit-based selection of bureaucrats is central to state capacity building, yet rare in developing countries. Most executives instead favor patronage -political discretion- in public employment. This paper proposes and tests an original theory to explain when executives forsake patronage for merit. The theory exploits exogenous variation in the institutional design of patronage states. In some, constitutions and budget laws monopolize patronage powers in the executive; in others, patronage benefits accrue to the legislature and public employees. When institutions fragment patronage powers and challengers control other government branches, merit becomes more incentive-compatible: it enables executives to deprive challengers of patronage while enhancing public goods provision to court electoral support. Drawing on 130 face-to-face elite interviews, a comparison of reforms in Paraguay, the Dominican Republic and the United States validates the theory. How patronage states are institutionally designed thus shapes their reform prospects: fragmented control over bad government can incentivize good government reforms.
Generative AI enabled