https://9p7pzq3jbl.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/ProdStage Skip to main content
Publications
Advanced Search

View metadata

dc.titleFinancial Disincentives to Formal Employment and Tax-Benefit Systems in Latin America
dc.contributor.authorDeza, María Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorJara, H. Xavier
dc.contributor.authorOliva, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Javier
dc.contributor.orgunitCountry Department Andean Group
dc.coverageColombia
dc.coveragePeru
dc.coverageBolivia
dc.coverageEcuador
dc.coverageVenezuela
dc.coverageSouth America
dc.date.available2020-05-01T15:00:00
dc.date.issue2020-05-01T14:00:00
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper is twofold. First, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the financial cost informal workers would incur in the event of entering formal employment in five Latin American countries: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela. Then, we analyze the extent to which formalizing informal workers would contribute to increase fiscal capacity in the region and assess the distributional implications of counterfactual entries to formal employment. Our results show a wide variation in financial disincentives to enter formal employment, with formalization tax rates ranging between 8.5 percent in Venezuela and 65 percent in Colombia. Formalization tax rates are particularly high for self-employed informal workers in all countries, and mainly driven by the high costs associated to social insurance contribution payments for this group. We further show that potential entries to formal employment would raise tax revenue in all countries but mainly through the effect of increased social insurance contribution payments, whereas personal income tax revenue would only increase marginally except in Bolivia and Venezuela. Interestingly, potential formalization of informal workers with the highest probability of being formal would allow capturing a substantial share of the additional tax revenue lost due to informality. In implementing formalization strategies, governments need to evaluate these potential fiscal gains against increased hiring costs for firms. In any case, there is evidence that formalization have positive effects in productivity and long-term growth.
dc.format.extent38
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002324
dc.identifier.urlhttps://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Financial-Disincentives-to-Formal-Employment-and-Tax-Benefit-Systems-in-Latin-America.pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.mediumAdobe PDF
dc.publisherInter-American Development Bank
dc.subjectSocial Security
dc.subjectTax Revenue
dc.subjectIncome Equality
dc.subjectIncome Tax
dc.subjectFormal Labor
dc.subjectInformal Labor
dc.subjectTax Reform
dc.subject.jelcodeI38 - Government Policy • Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
dc.subject.jelcodeH24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
dc.subject.jelcodeD13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
dc.subject.jelcodeI32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
dc.subject.keywordstaxes;Informality;Inequality;fiscal capacity;microsimulation
dc.typeTechnical Notes
idb.identifier.pubnumberIDB-TN-01907
idb.operationRG-T3253
Return to Publication