https://9p7pzq3jbl.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/ProdStage Skip to main content
Publications
Advanced Search

View metadata

dc.titleWhen Starting with the Most Expensive Option Makes Sense: Optimal Timing, Cost and Sectoral Allocation of Abatement Investment
dc.contributor.authorVogt-Schilb, Adrien
dc.contributor.authorMeunier, Guy
dc.contributor.authorHallegatte, Stephane
dc.contributor.orgunitClimate Change Solutions Division
dc.date.available2018-03-19T00:00:00
dc.date.issue2018-02-27T00:00:00
dc.description.abstractThis paper finds that it is optimal to start a long-term emission-reduction strategy with significant short-term abatement investment, even if the optimal carbon price starts low and grows progressively over time. Moreover, optimal marginal abatement investment costs differ across sectors of the economy. It may be preferable to spend $25 to avoid the marginal ton of carbon in a sector where abatement capital is expensive, such as public transportation, or in a sector with large abatement potential, such as the power sector, than $15 for the marginal ton in a sector with lower cost or lower abatement potential. The reason, distinct from learning spillovers, is that reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires investment in long-lived abatement capital such as clean power plants or public transport infrastructure. The value of abatement investment comes from avoided emissions, but also from the value of abatement capital in the future. The optimal leveled cost of conserved carbon can thus be higher than the optimal carbon price. It is higher in sectors with higher investment needs: those where abatement capital is more expensive or sectors with larger abatement potential. We compare our approach to the traditional abatement-cost-curve model and discuss implications for policy design.
dc.format.extent45
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0001014
dc.identifier.urlhttps://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/When-Starting-with-the-Most-Expensive-Option-Makes-Sense-Optimal-Timing-Cost-and-Sectoral-Allocation-of-Abatement-Investment.pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.mediumAdobe PDF
dc.publisherInter-American Development Bank
dc.subjectInvestment
dc.subjectClimate Finance
dc.subjectEnvironmental Policy
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gas Emission
dc.subjectCarbon Finance
dc.subjectClimate Change Adaptation
dc.subject.jelcodeQ52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs • Distributional Effects • Employment Effects
dc.subject.jelcodeQ54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming
dc.subject.jelcodeQ58 - Government Policy
dc.typeWorking Papers
idb.identifier.pubnumberWorking Papers
idb.operationRG-T3028
Return to Publication