https://9p7pzq3jbl.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/ProdStage Skip to main content
Publications
Advanced Search

View metadata

dc.titleA Structural Model of Electoral Accountability
dc.contributor.authorAruoba, S. Boragan
dc.contributor.authorDrazen, Allan
dc.contributor.authorVlaicu, Razvan
dc.contributor.orgunitDepartment of Research and Chief Economist
dc.date.available2017-05-24T00:00:00
dc.date.issue2017-05-19T00:00:00
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a structural approach to measuring the effects of electoral accountability. A political agency model with imperfect information is modeled in order to identify and quantify discipline and selection effects, using data on U.S. governors. It is found that the possibility of reelection provides a significant incentive for incumbents to exert effort, that is, a disciplining effect. A positive but weaker selection effect is also found. According to the model, the widely-used two-term regime improves voter welfare by 4.2 percent compared to a one-term regime and better voter information about the effort of governors would further increase voter welfare by up to 0.5 percent.
dc.format.extent61
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0000696
dc.identifier.urlhttps://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/A-Structural-Model-of-Electoral-Accountability.pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.mediumAdobe PDF
dc.publisherInter-American Development Bank
dc.subjectElections
dc.subject.keywordsDiscipline;Selection;Political agency;Elections;structural estimation;Maximum likelihood
dc.typeDiscussion Papers
idb.identifier.pubnumberDiscussion Papers
idb.operationRG-K1199
Return to Publication